...uncreative...
My life --- My thoughts

Wednesday, 30 June 2004

i think it is strange that people say michael moore distorts the facts and how obviously liberal he is but explain to me what was liberal about bowling for columbine?  also explain what facts he has distorted.  he doesn't claim anything to be fact that he has distorted.  you just have to be aware enough of the world around you to distort between his opinions and facts.  but then if you aren't good enough to do that with a michael moore film (which is fairly obvious compared to the rest of the world) then you probably don't know the facts anyways.  my last entry was not inspired by any facts or opinions about war.  it was inspired by the way the movie moved me.  i don't think i've ever been aware of the atrocities of war in fullest.  this moviee is the closest i have been.  i have seen footage on the news, saving private ryan and a plethora of other things noting how terrible war is but nothing affected me like this movie.  it is easy for us to say "war is terrible" but like i was trying to say in my last post, unless you have been there you don't know.  i don't know, i merely got a glimpse.  this glimpse has simply been a reconfirming moment in a long road of facts as to why i despise bush.  someone who doesn't know war should not be sending people there to take part in it.  any of you pro-bushies out there are free to comment on this but a little forewarning should be noted.  i will probably completely disregard your comment because i've spent the last four years getting comments as to why bush is not a terrible president and i have yet to run into a true reason.  if everyone would like an extensive list as to why bush is terrible feel free to contact me or just go see the movie. another thing about michael moore.  am i pawn of his game?  let's ask ourselves what he has to gain by who is or isn't president.  i can't thikn of anything, he is not the head of any major corporations, he is not the leader of any foreign nations, his career is basically dependent on bad presidents so why would he want a good president?  now if you look at everything bush and his buds gain from, going to war (twice), tax cuts, changing enviromental laws, etc etc you may just discover he has a helluva a lot to gain (or lose, hopefully in november).  i'd rather be "pawn" for the side whose idea of gain is bettering america than the side whose idea of gain is billions of dollars in their checkbooks.

posted by myblog, June 30, 2004 12:39 | link | comments (4)